Thank you very much. This world, as I have experienced it, has exhausted my capacity for believing in prima facie benevolent schemes. Such attempts to convince as many people as possible that some magical charismatic leader(s) andor connected movement will provide them with salvation have very questionable and ancient--read due for extinction--histories; they include essentially every major religion, cult, political movement, and professional sports teams / national teams (e.g. from the Olympics to the world cup). As Professor Robert Sapolsky of Stanford University has documented extensively in his research, the human tendency to seek out salvation--especially in the form of religion--(even if said reward lies after our death) has deep roots in how the average human mind is hardwired to process the challenges of risk and reward, specifically in the sine qua non realm of our neurotransmitters and given hedonic hotspots. In other words, as humans, we seem to thrive on believing that we will be rewarded for our hard work and dedication to a cause--no matter how forlorn andor illogical it may prove upon basic analysis. In many ways, this tendency has yielded some of our greatest successes--e.g. from perseverant scientists--but also equivalently it leaves almost all people (except perhaps those predisposed to sound critical thinking and apolitically iconoclastic ways, e.g. Jim Morrison PADF of the Doors PF when not high / stoned on heavy drugs) highly succeptible to believing that one's group and linked causes are certainly correct and, in some cases, worth fighting to the death for (including en masse). It really does strike me as preposterous that so few people take the time to tackle these potentially vistigial parts of our psyche before proceeding to propose a solution to some societal problem. With this noted, back to the main topic of this work, yes capitalism--specifially post Columbus (ie the rapacious childmurdering European explorer and his rapist hordes) capitalism is horrendous. In fact, I have analyzed its ill effects on the world at large and more specifically in my life so much that I probably should have already published a popular book on that topic alone. Here's one of my favorite insights, built quite humbly on the sagacious work of Professor Jennifer Lerner of Harvard University: capitalism literally depends on depression to succeed. How do we know this? Per Lerner's research, people tend to spend more money--including for items that they would normally forgo or demand lower prices for--when they are depressed. Thus, a very simple deduction reveals: capitalism thrives the most, especially in the daily grind interpersonal realms of urban hellholes, when people are DEPRESSED.
This should come as no surprise to keen observers of this dreadful system for organizing work and resources. Additionally, to make it more absurd, capitalism tends to reward otherwise desperately unfit--both physically and emotionally--humans with disproportionately large levels of socioeconomic success via the various mechanisms for gambling that we have built in to the modern version of this cancerous financial system. You don't have to be an anarcho-primitivist--in fact you can just be Jared Diamond the renowned author of Guns PF, Germs and Steel and the less well known (surprise surprise when you see its thesis) but far more polemically potent work from 1987 called "[Agriculture] The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race"--to realize that our modern societies, despite the popular stance that technology and various modern marvels have produced far better lives for average humans, are not only cauldrons of stress that have led to greater levels of mental illness but have in many ways left many people far worse offthan our so-called backwards hunter gatherer ancestors (at least in terms of free time and holistically uplifting connections to the natural world, i.e. the outdoors, including: clean water and oceans preferably free of tons of plastic among other often invisible pollutants).
So ultimately am I a true anti-capitalist? On the face of it--due to my historical involvement, though inevitably with great reserve and at times disdain, with it as a beneficiary and even conscientious investor (ie focusing on the Triple Bottom Line)--no. However, I know that we have to strive for a better, more holistically viable way of organizing our excessive numbers of human beings on this planet. I am not naive enough to believe that the fiat system will magically disappear soon due to its inherently questionable standards--at least not anymore and if it does get phased out it will certainly not be in our lifetime. However, per the principles of Kaizen, I know that improvement, most importantly of well-being, does not necessitate the use of money--thus, we can and should strive to enjoy a moneyfree harmonious society as much as possible as Mark Boyle of Ireland and many others have shown is possible with enough dedication and per the work of Lerner, we can be sure that this will yield significantly happier people as we practice using money as little as possible.
[Going further]
Indeed, society relies on ineptitude interpersonally and financially to maintain its goddamned status quo. It's origins lie in the realm of social expediency glamoured (a term I picked up from Games of thrones AKA GOT analytical circles when describing Melisandra and Lord of the Light Followers using magical rubies to cover up their true physical appearances) as necessity in the raising of children especially. After all, especially within the Santa Claus myth gone mad tradition of Christianity, it is essentially universally acceptedacross all denominations / sects--except perhaps for the Children of God sex cult from the 60s and 70s that practiced having sexual intercourse with children?--that maintaining / protecting the innocence of children is of paramount importance. Thus, innumerable parents / guardians / community leaders of that Weltanschaaung have gone out of their way to set up a largely artificial Disneyfied environment for children--amidst the most pornified via even cell phones e.g. and violent--at least in American gun polluted--culture ever known in human history. Per Hannah Montana / Miley Cyrus, we all know where that story goes. And then to make matters worse, e.g. in my life experience, these deluded excuse for adults who shackle and hamstring innumerable young people into adulthood with these excessively repressive approaches--versus the historically sexually permissive and thriving cultures of Polynesia e.g.--somehow magically expect one to find and settle down with an ideal spouse, preferably in line with their class and phenotypic standards, with essentially no psychological baggage or problems. wtf??!!
Look I know and agree with the age old cliche that nobody is perfect. But you have got to be kidding me if you try to argue to me that the sort of upbringing that I received was even remotely acceptable for the sake of my cultivating a successful heterosexually well adjusted life with high sustainable levels of well being for me and my loved ones. Truly ridiculous.
So back to the more philosophical original point, given per Lerner et al that capitalism thrives most when people are depressed--including, perhaps most sinisterly, collectively--it makes sense that we live in a world that despite its prima facie culture of hero worship for capitistically, athletically, and or politically successful individuals is actually far more invested in facilitating the widespread (but sustainable and thus manageable for the sake of greater profits for the few / oligarchs) failure of as many people as possible. So how does one achieve this, other than the widespread brainwashing that Big Brother society maintains, there is the added impetus of fear--including somewhat understandably of unwanted pregnancy andor STIs, though, except for goddamned AIDS which apparently coconut oil and products kill anyway, those are really overhyped given abortion, adoption, and antibiotics / profilactics--and as mentioned at length in this work the sponsoring of ineptitude and failure, especially romantically.Thatway, most people will live as depressed capitalistic slaves.
Clearly, in line with and extending the analysis of Power PF Korda PF, pornography as it relates to the status quo ultimately serves as an extension of dominance via the nefariously spectacle-filled world of modernity. In other words, a more enlightening reading of / analysis of (take on) the archetypal value of porn emerges as: the dominant males in human society--ie those with good jobs and good looking spouses especially heterosexually--depend on porn (and similarly commodified andor fruitless forms of sexual attention, including strip clubs) to keep the inevitably frustrated libidos in check of socioeconomically and heterosexually unsuccessful males by almost guaranteeing that most of them will acquiesce to the status quo expectation of masturbating to the point of ejaculation during or soon after said spectacle reinforcing influences. Thus, consider it the equivalent of dominant males in our African savanna past showing off as they fuck the most sexually desirable females, while frustrated sexually immature andor unsuccessful onlookersstare in envy and most likely masturbate during or soon after said displays. Of course, the complex constantly in flux and metaphysically hackable nature of our modern technologically empowered world as well as prima facie counterintuitive (but ultimately the so called bulls of said scene usually go back to wanking during or following the horrible often commodified goddamned gang bang whore encounters) fetishes of cuckolding and various forms of libertine sex--which ideally I do prefer especially Tania and PADF in Xandra sex--of swingers and loose party girls and their random paramours PF makes the relationship between the dominant and (submissive) loser males slightly more complicated than in our hunter gatherer past; however, for the most part, Iwould argue that thearchetypes have remained largely the same--though tenuously and often artificially in our often socially anomie polluted urban? lives.
Thus--potentially at least--nofapping, especially my version of outcompeting it and ultimately replacing it with a metaphysically empowered construction of a realm in which I enjoy all pleasures and thus states of being that are more pleasurable than all pleasurable experiences (including all pleasurable sex and all pleasurable drugs and all pleasurable games) is simultaneously the most enlightened (and enlightening) swadeshi style process of self-empowerment and a call to arms / rallying cry to all disenfranchised (formerly / historically losers, especially fellow heterosexual males) peers to rise up and fight back against the often unfit fat small penises of so called romantically and heterosexually successful males who have terrorized us via their randomly lucky corporatesanctioned echelons of socioeconomic and sexual power.
Coeds love PADF ready to die PADF ASAP happily!
