Wednesday, January 26, 2011

? ?

Best Highs, :) Truly absurd; rather, L of Most True A, http://www.royal.gov.ukpaf –> Thailand and beter Biotecture Friends PADF Paul Ainsworth Francis.

Arguably, including the given of my arguments that there is no true qualitative value,  knowledge is useless since no thought causes anything. All things are predetermined per Quantum Mechanics/Quantum Determinism (cite recent/currently gainfully employed voices inc Paul Ainsworth Francis); thus, arguably there is no causal link between degree [amount of thought, inc time] and [level of success] any outcome; all of said success terminology is a matter of interpretive and fallaciously causal-type thinking/ontology(ies). Eg: solving of a problem in math or any subject faster as linked [at best truly correlationally] traditionally to high IQ {eg MENSA level} [or even luck] is proof of what the future demands, not the power of high IQ causationally.

 What I've read of and from Kastrup ( including LATEST DIALOGUES The Legacy of a Truth-Seeker ) makes me think of my recent forays into Vedantic thought, spurred on via Schrodinger's writing.

Oh and in all of this my Jamaican common sense, au Bob Marley, is still on guard against what he dubbed "some people think life is just a dream" ("Crisis").
 .

Dream or no dream, fate or no fate, it seems that one's environment is a key determining aspect of not just experience but whatever truth we may ever find, especially as related to consistency. As much as I don't like debating, why I find David Pearce so compelling is not just that his heart is in the right place as you [a friend of mine] say but that even if we have very good reasons to question the details of his agenda, the overall / ongoing (gotta go Brahman Atman and say the) unity of the concept of enjoying "life-long happiness of an intensity now physiologically unimaginable" is the most powerful rephrasing of the transcendent concept of nirvana / nibbana bliss supreme / enlightenment that i have ever come across; it's as if the consciousness that brought about the discovery of his words has embodied them via my life Atman Brahman to mean: HERE AND NOW, enjoy life-long happiness of an intensity..this is what I've been feeling since first reading and meditating on his writing on Wednesday and contrary to happiness overload, per his concept of " recalibrate[ing] our hedonic treadmill above a genetically constrained ceiling," i feel like these improvements, while firmly in the realm of happiness, are still connected to this world including of periodic physical pain / discomfort; thus, they are so very real and i appreciate them even more, even amidst physical andor psychological pain, e.g. of suffering through gainful employment in a city.

PADF Sahaja PF Reversegangbangs PADF drugs PADF profitably PADFPF: Nederlands Effect Revolution here : PADF Paul Ainsworth Francis PADF PF married to sixty female supermodels!! Sahaja is that nature which, when established in oneself, brings the state of absolute freedom and peace.[10]

from PADF Keith Richards PF to PADF Tommy Lee PF, PADF only PADF Paul Ainsworth Francis PADF PF snags the hottest girls without even trying. Always have, always will.
PF Mick Jagger PADF PF
My secrets must be poetic to be believable.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mick_jagger.html#3c783Oz345i50eQ8.99
PF Drake PF
PADF Jim Morrison PADF PF
PADF Jim Morrison PADF Ainsworth Francis PADF

The Amazingly Enlightening Universal Language of Affinities PF

[Here as I write,] I am filled with a vision, inspired via the genius of Goethe PF, of all of Creation as the manifestation of--andor products of--affinities, specifically of [the realm of / the discipline of] Chemistry PF. I see / viscerally know of the immediate [and ongoing, inc since the Big Bang, and potentially Rovellian PF time symm based] interactions / processes {including the largely unseen / invisible ones beyond our immediate macroscopic human gaze, and even the microscopic ones when aided with various technologies} based on scientifically viable laws of attraction--and thus lack thereof, inc of Noble gases for example, and repulsion as well. In terms of the given anthropic--human based--applications that may arise from this sort of thinking, certainly it may assist/help one to beter PF discern which affinities in line avec EPPs PF are most likely to be actualized {i.e. succeed in planning based parlance} from thought, persist, end andor evolve--perhaps into repulsion--and the correlations therein for all said given states of affinity, including cycles/patterns [per ANSOPF style of thought]. ; significantly, enlightening to combine avec mi theory of Pleasure Based Natural Selection, then further applied to nature of harmony [and thus dissonance/variations in between] and systemic/systematic homeostasis (SH). Thus affinities as part of nature's way of guiding [at least life / certainly humanity therein] biochemical interactions / realities to maximize pleasure PADF PF [?? how very potentially revolutionary / significantly polemical].. For if nature's plan, at least biologically, is to maximize pleasure, then certainly this is radically in line with the most fecund and extreme of hedonistic lifestyles / practices. Hence Advantageous ~~ greatest amount of most fecund PF pleasures PADF PF. {cite: [Being] Increasingly Greater Harmony]INCREASINGLY GREATER HARMONY            If we view SH as a manifestation of harmony (harmonically viable relationships over time) and vice versa au E = mc^2, there is a natural tendency, including Pleasure-based Natural Selection, towards producing harmonious relationships and results [internally & externally/ individually & systemically], especially from a sentient perspective, with the pleasure principle proving dominant.
;.. THEORY OF PLEASURE-BASED NATURAL SELECTION
            Viewing survival and evolution from the perspective of the ability to enjoy pleasure is a purer and more accurate way of comprehending the statistical data of population trends, as it goes directly to the binary code of life—in other words, if one were to view pain and pleasure as roughly equivalent to 0s and 1s, as in the machine code of computers. Nature has integrated pleasure into a variety of survival mechanisms. Thus, from unicellular organisms to mammals, animals display an innate aversion to immediately painful occurrences, for example having one’s finger burned from fire. This is not to deny the existence of [what some psychologists call] abnormal psychologies, especially sadomasochistic behaviors {footnote Pinker’s work abt how overcoming aversion to causing others pain causes sadist pleasure, what of masochist?}; however, for the most part, it is clear that the presence of pleasure and pain exist as guides for the functions of life, including healthy homeostasis and sexual reproduction. Furthermore, this code exists as a direct indicator of nature’s preferences. In other words, when one experiences fecund pleasure—i.e. the sort that does not lead to immediate disaster, as in the case of a bout of pleasure-filled hubris leading to serious injury or death—this can be viewed as nature rewarding one for one’s fitness. Overtime, this should translate into the fittest members of a species enjoying the most pleasure consistently. This is not meant to justify social exploitation in which one group enjoys pleasure at the expense of the well-being of another group, as manifested via slavery etc. Nor is it meant to argue that those individuals or groups who enjoy greater levels of pleasure via sadistic behavior are inherently fitter than those who they have managed to exploit. In fact, it may prove the opposite over time, as the terrorized group, for example in the case of certain Jewish populations, often recovers in a major way and becomes even more powerful proportionally than the group that once tortured them, as exhibited in the socioeconomic well-being of many Jews versus groups that once persecuted and/or enslaved them, including of the Spanish Inquisition and the Roman Empire. However, pleasure is at a minimum an indicator of extreme differences in the capacity for and ultimately the practice of sexual reproduction, as for example individuals who are born with painful, debilitating conditions rarely reproduce. [granted adjust for subtleties in code of life/natural biological phenomena; i.e. consider things that are integral/essential for survival that are painful inc childbirth; include studies/practices that show squatting birth in humans is less painful though (BBC 4/4/12); so perhaps in most cases even painful things can be reduced with more natural/holistic ways; moreover, pain/pleasure often offset each other, esp over time, and due to influences of society etc., e.g. avoiding pain of having children may overtime produce undesired {potentially painful} state of social anomie, esp in developing countries/highly traditional societies.] With appropriate extrapolative techniques one can view the fecund enjoyment of pleasure as a predictor of nature’s will. Thus, Pleasure-based Natural Selection meshes well with theories of calculating future outcomes, including quantum determinism.
Many factors contribute to fitness, especially from the perspective of Pleasure-based Natural Selection. In the case of inhabitants of the Netherlands, [we must tackle the most {idiosyncratic/distinguishing} features of the society, à research / study & cite more subtle and nuanced differences with other societies to best comprehend the implications of this point of view among the Dutch … [study reproduction patterns and connections to socioeconomic well-being etc. in other countries vs. Holland]

So at best it seems the only viable course, perhaps most in line with our earth and the celestial bodies which--Albert Einstein's Field Equations of General Relativity prove--move through space along the easiest possible path is to enjoy the predetermined ride of Creation and thus "have [our] kicks before the whole *house goes up in flames" (Jim Morrison PADF PF).

No comments:

Post a Comment